龙骑士城堡奇幻论坛's Archiver

光与影 发表于 2007-9-18 20:18

关于软炸对宿敌的伤害

  依稀记得在那里看到过软炸的宿敌增加的伤害对免疫重击的怪物无效,因此宿敌选不死生物是相当亏的。然则最近想查询规则核实的时候却再也找不到相关描述了,难道是3e规则?抑或是我当时看走眼了=。=?

游侠箭手 发表于 2007-9-18 20:30

3E有这条,3R没了。

Gilthanas 发表于 2007-9-18 22:48

[quote]Undead are indeed immune to critical hits and are also immune to sneak attacks and the ranger’s favored enemy bonuses. (The same holds true for constructs, elementals, and oozes.) Rangers who choose these types of creatures as favored enemies are giving up power. (The designers did this intentionally.)[/quote]
From MainFAQv06272003

[quote]Ranger
Does a ranger still deal extra damage to a favored enemy immune to critical hits (such as constructs or undead)?
Yes.[/quote]
From Main35FAQv04202007

GZYZ 发表于 2007-9-19 12:13

我猜设计的原意是“软扎对他宿敌的弱点了如指掌,于是可以在战斗中针对弱点攻击,这就是伤害加值的由来。对于构装等没有明显弱点于是免疫针对宿敌的增强伤害。”

cobalt 发表于 2007-9-19 12:19

3.0的设计就是那样,软炸的宿敌伤害是基于精确针对弱点的攻击。
到了3.5就没说了。

光与影 发表于 2007-9-19 16:29

恩,果然是3e规则亚,怪不得现在找不到了。。

页: [1]

Powered by Discuz! Archiver 6.1.0  © 2001-2007 Comsenz Inc.